Linguocognitive Characteristics of Modified Ad-Hoc Lexical Units in the Telecinematic Discourse

Authors

  • Diana Haydanka Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/ewqmsw46

Keywords:

ad-hoc word-formation, condensed ad-hoc lexical units, linguocognitive characteristics, conversion, word-formation by analogy

Abstract

Recently ad-hoc word-formation research has received a plenty of attention from the perspective of linguocognitive paradigm that focuses on the unity of cognition, language, speech and metacontext. For this reason, the present article elucidates ad-hoc word formation in the telecinematic discourse to highlight complex mental processes behind the formation of an ad-hoc lexical unit, namely linguocognitive procedures, operations, and mechanisms. The ad-hoc words are classified based on the principle of sense transmission, hence we outline aggregated, condensed, and modified ad-hoc lexical units. The author has focused particular attention on the ad-hoc words, coined through conversion and by analogy employing the algorithm of linguocognitive meaning construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. 1985. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. (Editors). London: Longman.

Abrosimova L. 2014. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie ustanovki kognitivnogo pohoda k izucheniyu slovoobrazovaniya (Theoretical and methodological principles of the cognitive approach to word-formation research). Vestnik Baltiyskogo federalnogo universiteta im. I. Kanta (Bulletin of E. Kant Baltic Federal University). vol. 2. 2014: 7–17.

Batalov O. 2004. Kognitivno-funktsionalnyiy aspekt okkazionalnogo slovoobrazovaniya v hudozhestvennom tekste: avtoref. diss. na soiskanie nauch. stepeni kand. filol. nauk (Cognitive and functional aspect of ad-hoc word-formation in a literary text: thesis for a degree of a candidate of sciences). Nizhniy Novgorod.

Bauer L. 2006. Compounds and Minor Word-Formation Types. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Aarts B., McMahon A. (Editors). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006. 483–506.

Benczes R. 2006. Creative Compounding in English: The Semantics of Metaphorical and Metonymical Noun-Noun Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bialyk V. 2015. Lexical Quantor as a Representative of Linguistic Knowledge in Translation. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi National University, no 754–755, 2015: 9–11.

Darienko N. 2000. Kohnityvnyi pidkhid do vyvchennia okazionalizmiv problemy ta zavdannia (Cognitive approach to ad-hoc word research: problems and research tasks). Zapysky z zahalnoi linhvistyky (Papers on Linguistics). Odessa National University: Latstar, vol. 4. 2002: 160.

Dirven R. 2000. Cognitive Linguistics. Linguistic Agency, University-GH Essen.

Don J. 2005. On Conversion, Relisting and Zero-Derivation. A comment on Rochelle Lieber: English word-formation processes. SKASE Journal for Theoretical Linguistics, no 2(2), 2005: 2–16. Found 24.04.2018. Address: http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL03/02.pdf.

Fauconnier G. & Turner М. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Hohenhaus P. 2007. How to Do even More Things with Nonce Words (Other than Naming). Lexical Creativity. Texts and Contexts. Munat J. (Editor). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007: 15–39.

Janney R. 2012. Pragmatics and Cinematic Discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. vol. 8, no 1, 2012: 85–113.

Lehrer A. 2007. Blendalicious. Lexical Creativity. Lexical Creativity. Texts and Contexts. Munat J. (Editor). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007: 115–137.

Lieber R. 2005. English Word-Formation Processes. Observations, Issues and Thoughts on Future Research. Handbook of Word-Formation. Stekauer P., Lieber R. (Editors). Dordrecht: Springer, 2005: 375–427.

Lotman, Yu. 1970. Struktura lyteraturnoho teksta (The Structure of the Literary Text). Moscow: Prosveshcheniie.

Marchand H. 1966. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-Formation. University of Alabama Press.

Martsa S. 2013. Conversion in English: A Cognitive-Semantic Approach. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Porto D. 2007. Creative Lexical Categorisation in a Narrative Fiction. Lexical Creativity. Texts and Contexts. Munat J. (Editor), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007: 213–239.

Renouf A. 2007. Tracing Lexical Productivity and Creativity in the British Media: «The Chavs and the Chav-Nots». Lexical Creativity. Texts and Contexts. Munat J. (Editor). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007: 61–93.

Shatalova Yu. 2009. Neuzualnuje sposoby sozdanija novykh slov v povsednevnoy razgovornoy rechi (Occasional word-formation types in everyday speech). no 2, 2009: 192–196. Found 01.01.2018. Address: https://moluch.ru/archive/2/120/.

Veale T. 2007. Dynamic Creation of Analogically-Motivated Terms and Categories in Lexical Ontologies. Lexical Creativity. Texts and Contexts. Munat J. (Editor). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007: 189–213.

Yenikieeva S. 2006. Synerhetyzm funktsionalnoi transoriientatsii linhvalnykh odynyts (Synergy of The Language Units Functional Transorientation). Bulletin of Sumy State University, vol. 11, issue 95, 2006: 43–51.

Zatsny Yu. 1997. Neolohizmy anhliiskoi movy 80–90-kh rokiv XX stolittia (Neologisms in the English language in the 1980s – 1990s). Zaporizhzhia.

Dictionaries:

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Found 03.09.2020. Address: https://ahdictionary.com/.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

Issue

Section

Arts and Humanities

How to Cite

Haydanka, D. (2026). Linguocognitive Characteristics of Modified Ad-Hoc Lexical Units in the Telecinematic Discourse. Bulletin of Akaki Tsereteli State University, 2(16), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.52340/ewqmsw46

Similar Articles

1-10 of 155

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.